Implementasi Rencana Kontinjensi Nuklir Reaktor Riset Dalam Upaya Kesiapsiagaan Nuklir

Authors

  • Dewi Aprialiani Universitas Pertahanan, Bogor, Indonesia Badan Pengawas Tenaga Nuklir
  • I Dewa Ketut Kerta Widana Universitas Pertahanan, Bogor, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33172/jmb.v5i2.460

Abstract

Indonesia has three nuclear research reactors, nemely: RSG-GAS in Serpong, TRIGA2000 reactor in Bandung, and Kartini reactor in Yogyakarta. Besides being useful, nuclear reactor has inharent risk due to its radiation hazard. The research reactor nuclear contingency plan was prepared for nuclear preparedness. The study aimed to analyze the implementation of the research reactors’ nuclear contingency plans. The study used an analytic descriptive qualitative methods. The results showed that the nuclear contingency plans of the three research reactors have different implementation range due to their different hazard risks. However, the nuclear emergency responses were the same, they were: sheltering, evacuation, provision of KI tablets, and prohibition of consumption of local food and contaminated river/ ground water. The research reactors’ nuclear contingency plans have not discussed criteria used for taking nuclear emergency responses. The results also showed that the nuclear contingency plan of RSG-GAS in Serpong and the Kartini reactor in Yogyakarta have been implemented partially. While for the TRIGA2000 reactor nuclear contingency plan in Bandung has not been implemented yet. A legal umbrella is needed to implement the research reactor nuclear contingency plan. Thus, coordination and active role from all stakeholders are needed to be enhanced in order to be able to resolve the existing obstacles and challenges.

References

Ashley, SF., Vaughan, G.J., Nuttall, W.J., Thomas, P.J. (2017). “Considerations in relation to off-site emergency procedures and response for nuclear accidents”. Journal Process Safety and Environmental Protection, Vol II (2).

BAPETEN, BNPB. (2013), “Rencana kontinjensi dalam menghadapi ancaman kedaruratan nuklir Setu kota Tangerang Selatan, provinsi Banten”. Jakarta.

BAPETEN. (2014). Rencana Kontinjensi dalam menghadapi ancaman bencana kecelakaan nuklir di kota Bandung provinsi Jawa Barat. Jakarta.

BAPETEN. (2016). Rencana kontinjensi reaktor Kartini. Jakarta.

BAPETEN. (2016). Pengawasan Pemanfaatan Tenaga Nuklir di Indonesia: Laporan Tahunan 2016. Jakarta.

Berita BATAN. (2016). Retrieved from http://www.batan.go.id/index.php/id/kedeputian/ pendayagunaan-teknologi-nuklir/reaktor-serba-guna/2807-kesiapsiagaan-tanggap-darurat-nuklir-diuji-melalui-latihan-kedaruratan-nuklir, diakases pada 28 Septermber 2018.

Berita BAPETEN, I-CoNSEP, “Penanganan Kedaruratan pada Kejadian Bencana di Kawasan Nuklir Yogyakarta” tanggal 11 September 2016. Retrieved from https://www.bapeten.go.id/?p=37243, diakses pada 28 Septermber 2019.

Berita BAPETEN, “Gladi Lapang Nasional Penanggulangan Kedaruratan Nuklir” tanggal 10 November 2016. Retrieved from https://www.bapeten.go.id/?p=40552, diakses pada 28 Septermber 2018.

BNPB. (2011). Panduan Perencanaan Kontinjensi Menghadapi Bencana. Jakarta.

BNPB. Retrieved from https://bnpb.go.id, diakses pada 4 Oktober 2019.

Copolla, Damon P. (2011). Introduction to International Disaster Management. Elsevier Inc.

IAEA. (1996). INSAG-10: Defence in Depth in Nuclear Safety. Vienna.

IAEA. (2005). EPR-Medical: Generic procedures for medical response during a nuclear or radiological emergency. Vienna.

IAEA. (2007). GSG-2.1: Arrangements for Preparedness for a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency. Vienna.

IAEA. (2012). GSG-2: Criteria for Use in Preparedness and Response for Nuclear or Radiological Emergency. Vienna.

IAEA. (2013). EPR-NPP Public Protective Actions: Actions to Protect the Public in an Emergency due to Severe Conditions at a Light Water Reactor. Vienna.

IAEA. (2015). GSR part 7: Preparedness and Response for a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency. Vienna.

Maarif, Syamsul. (2012). Pikiran dan Gagasan Penanggulangan Bencana di Indonesia. Jakarta: BNPB.

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). Towards an All-Hazards Approach to Emergency Preparedness and Response: Lessons Learnt from Non-Nuclear Events. NEA No. 7308.

Peraturan Pemerintah No. 21 Tahun 2008 tentang Penyelenggaraan Penanggulangan Bencana.

Peraturan Pemerintah No. 29 Tahun 2008 tentang perizinan pemanfaatan sumber radiasi pengion dan bahan nuklir.

Peraturan Pemerintah No. 33 Tahun 2007 tentang keselamatan radiasi pengion dan keamanan sumber radiasi.

Peraturan Pemerintah No. 54 Tahun 2012 tentang Keselamatan dan Keamanan Instalasi Nuklir.

Tribunjogja.com, “REALTIME NEWS: BPBD DIY dan Batan Akan Simulasikan Penanganan Bencana Nuklir”. Retrieved from http://jogja.tribunnews.com/2016/08/31/realtime-news-bpbd-diy-dan-batan-akan-simulasikan-penanganan-bencana-nuklir, diakses pada 28 September 2019.

UNISDR. (2017). “Terminology on Disaster Risk Reduction” Retrieved from https://www.unisdr.org/we/inform/terminology United Nations, Disaster, diakses pada 13 Agustus 2019.

Undang-Undang No. 24 Tahun 2007 tentang Penanggulangan Bencana

WHO. (1999). Guidelines for Iodine Prophylaxis Following Nuclear Accidents. Geneva.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-31

How to Cite

Aprialiani, D., & Kerta Widana, I. D. K. (2019). Implementasi Rencana Kontinjensi Nuklir Reaktor Riset Dalam Upaya Kesiapsiagaan Nuklir. Jurnal Manajemen Bencana (JMB), 5(2). https://doi.org/10.33172/jmb.v5i2.460