FOREIGN POLICY ON CLIMATE CHANGE UNDER THE TRUMP’S PRESIDENCY: PARIS AGREEMENT

The issue of climate change is scorching to discuss; Greenhouse Gas Emissions produced by humans themselves have a major impact on the earth. The Paris Agreement was created to slow the pace of climate change by binding participating countries to commit to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. During the Barack Obama administration, foreign policy believed in and supported the Paris Agreement's cooperation in inhibiting the pace of climate change. In contrast to the next period, which was continued by President Donald Trump, who had a realistic nature and was skeptical of climate change. This is one of the supporting factors in understanding the United States' foreign policy towards the Paris agreement under the Trump presidency.


Introduction
Climate change is caused by an increase in the temperature of the earth's surface.
Climate change has been a constant threat. The threat of climate change cannot be avoided by human activities, which do not want to protect the environment and exploit natural resources in excess. Greenhouse Gas Emissions are currently produced from industrialized countries, with increasing greenhouse gas emissions making the Jurnal Diplomasi Pertahanan, Volume 8, Nomor 1, 2022 E-ISSN 2746-8496 earth's condition increasingly threatened (Global Warming). Climate change has a high potential to reduce the quality of human life on earth. Therefore, climate change is considered a global issue that must be addressed immediately to facilitate economic and social development by the community's welfare.
After the cold war that hit the international world, the international political system changed, prioritizing hard power issues and penetrating soft power issues such as environmental issues. The environment issue has become a topic that is very This annual meeting is known as the Conference of the Pities (COP). World leaders as members gathered to discuss and negotiate to make a more detailed rule to regulate the process of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Then the COP meeting, which was considered a significant development, was found in the 3rd COP meeting.
COP 3, held in Kyoto, Japan, resulted in the existence of a set of regulations known as the Kyoto Protocol. The Kyoto Protocol is an agreement between countries involved in the UNFCCC and is an agreement that regulates actions to prevent the threat of Then from the beginning of the design of the Kyoto Protocol, some things were not understood, namely that there were countries that signed the Kyoto Protocol but did not ratify it. For example, the United States is a developed industrial country and a country that signed the Kyoto Protocol but the United States did not ratify the agreement. Indeed, the United States did not provide a clear reason why the country did not ratify, but this is one of the shortcomings of the Kyoto Protocol that causes its performance to be seen as less binding.
After the Kyoto Protocol, the Paris Agreement was formed to solve climate change. This agreement was produced at the 21st COP of the United Nations Framework on Climate Change (UNFCCC) from November 30 to December 12, 2015.
The Paris Agreement is binding with a shared commitment to combat climate change.
The Paris Agreement strived to answer the challenges that the previous agreement could not appropriately handle. The Kyoto Protocol, even though it is legally binding and provides penalties for breaches of the agreement, is not able to contain the rate of global temperature rise and climate change because it only affects developed countries. Developing countries do not have an obligation to reduce their gas emissions, and even countries with large forest areas are provided with financial assistance not to cut their forests. The Kyoto Protocol provides the right impetus for environmental restoration but is not yet the answer as countries can take advantage of the agreement.
Based on the results of the Paris Agreement, countries are given the responsibility to reduce greenhouse gas emissions rapidly. In addition, it was also agreed that countries in the world are committed to maintaining the threshold for increasing the earth's temperature. The Paris Agreement aims to increase the ability to adapt to the

Research Methods
The type of research used is descriptive research. Where the author describes the reasons for the withdrawal of the United States from the Paris Agreement and explains the reasons for making the decision. As for this research, the researcher will use the foreign policy formulation process proposed by James N. Rosenau In the context of this research, the researcher will use one of the models in the adaptive model of foreign policy is preservative adaptation. This model describes the response given by a country in the face of demands or encouragement from domestic and international aspects, in other words, the foreign policy produced by a country is the result of the internal (domestic) encouragement or demands of the country and external demands/pushes against the country The type of data used in this study is secondary data, namely data obtained from literature studies and data from browsing through the internet. This study formulates problems in understanding the United States' foreign policy towards the Paris agreement under the Trump presidency.

Results and Discussion
Every foreign policy issued by a country will always have an element of national interest in it because the national interest is one of the foundations of the formation of foreign policy. 10  China. The US is seen as the main factor that led to the initial success of the agreement.
Human agreements are a legacy of the Obama Administration in this environment seeking to reduce the negative impact of industrial activities on the environment. The Obama administration's eco-friendly agenda seeks to protect and maintain a better world for the next generation. As the nations of the world unite to pledge globally to curb climate change, Obama and his administration are encouraging many other countries to set their sights and goals on achieving these targets.

Conclusion
Trump's decision was driven by domestic US politics and his personal preferences rather than the burden on the US imposed by the Paris Agreement. Under the American tripartite system; The President, Congress, and the Supreme Court share the power to make climate policy, and as the growing benefits of clean energy and increasing popular pressure (Gallup, 2017) have forced politicians to take action on climate change, the Trump administration is facing an uphill battle in overthrowing climate regulation. Obama era (Brian, 2017). There is still uncertainty about what can be achieved with climate deregulation under the Trump Administration.

Thank You Note
Thanks to God Almighty for giving long life and health in working on this journal.
Then I try to help myself by working hard and not complaining even a little. then, I would like to thank Prof. A A. Banyu who has encouraged me and other students to write this Journal.