Mispersepsi Dalam Sengketa Laut Tiongkok Selatan dan Peluang Diplomasi Pertahanan Indonesia

Yoedhi Swastanto, Rodon Pedrason, Yandry Kurniawan, Muhammad Arif


Abstrak--Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memahami persepsi dan mispersepsi antarnegara pengaku kedaulatan di Laut Tiongkok Selatan, serta melihat peluang diplomasi pertahanan Indonesia. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif, penelitian ini memiliki dua bagian analisis utama. Bagian pertama berisikan analisis mengenai persepsi dan mispersepsi negara-negara yang memiliki klaim kedaulatan di wilayah maritime yang berpotensi bereskalasi menjadi konflik kekerasan. Untuk bagian pertama ini peneliti akan menggunakan pendekatan persepsi dan mispersepsi dalam politik internasional. Bagian kedua berisikan analisis mengenai peluang diplomasi pertahanan Indonesia untuk meredam mispersepsi antarnegara dan meningkatkan sikap saling percaya untuk mencegah eskalasi konflik di wilayah maritim ini. Untuk bagian kedua ini peneliti akan menggunakan pendekatan diplomasi pertahanan. Secara akademik dan empirik, Penelitian            ini akan berkontribusi  memberikan  alternative pemahaman dan masukan kebijakan terkait sengketa di Laut Tiongkok Selatan melalui analisis yang memiliki sandaran teoritik yang jelas (theory-informed analysis).

Kata Kunci: Laut Tiongkok Selatan, persepsi, mispersepsi, diplomasi pertahanan


Abstract--This study aims to understand the perception and misperception of the claimant states in the South China Sea disputes and examine the opportunities for Indonesia's defense diplomacy. Using qualitative method, this study proceeds with two main parts. The first part analyzes the prospect of conflict escalation caused by the perception and misperception among the claimant states in the South China Sea disputes. The authors employ perception and misperception approach in International Relations in the analysis. The second part of the study examines the opportunities for Indonesia's defense diplomacy in reducing the misperception, mitigating the confict escalation as well as increasing mutual trust and confidence among the conflicting parties. In this second part, the authors make use of "defense diplomacy" as the conceptual tool. This study is academically and empirically significant as it contributes by giving alternative understanding on the South China Sea disputes as well as research-based and theory-informed policy recommendation.

Keywords: South China Sea, perception and misperception, defense diplomacy

Full Text:



Daftar Pustaka

Buku dan Jurnal Ilmiah

Buku Putih Pertahanan Indonesia. Jakarta: Kementerian Pertahanan Republik Indonesia, 2015.

Buku Putih Pertahanan Indonesia 2008. Jakarta: Departemen Pertahanan Republik Indonesia, 2008.

Buku Putih: Mempertahankan Tanah Air Memasuki Abad 21. Jakarta: Departemen Pertahanan Republik Indonesia, 2003.

Butcher, John G., and R. E. Elson. Sovereignty and the Sea: How Indonesia Became an Archipelagic State. Singapore: National

University of Singapore Press, 2017. Chung, C.P.C. (2015), ―Drawing the U-shaped Line: China‘s Claim in the

South China Sea, 1946-1974‖, Modern China, Vol. 42(1): 38-72. Cottey, Andrew and Anthony Forster, ―Introduction, The Adelphi Papers 44, no. 365 (2004).

Cottey, Andrew and Anthony Forster, ―Chapter 1: Strategic Engagement: Defence Diplomacy as a Means of Conflict Prevention, The Adelphi Papers 44, no. 365 (2004).

Bitzinger, Richard A., ―A New Arms Race? Explaining Recent Southeast Asian Military Acquisitions, Contemporary Southeast Asia 32, no. 1 (2010): 50–69.

Butcher, John G. and R. E. Elson, Sovereignty and the Sea: How Indonesia Became an Archipelagic State (Singapore: National University of Singapore Press, 2017)Erickson, Andrew S.,―America‘s Security Role in the South China Sea, Naval War College Review 69, no. 1 (2016): 40.

Djalal, Hasjim, Indonesia and the Law of the Sea (Jakarta: Centre for Strategic and International Studies, 1995).

Dolven, Ben, Jennifer K. Elsea, Susan V. Lawrence, Ronald O. Rourke, and Ian E. Rinehart. Chinese Land Reclamation in the South China Sea: Implications and Policy Options. CRS Report, 2015.

Forster, Anthony, Armed Forces and Society in Europe (Basingtoke: PALGRAVE, 2006).

Frederick, B.A. et.al., (2017) ―The Issue Corrales of War Territorial Claims Data, 1816-2001, Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 54(1): 99-108.

Gindarsah, Iis. Indonesia’s Defence Diplomacy: Harnessing the Hedging Strategy Against Regional Uncertainties. RSIS Working Paper. Vol.293. RSIS Working Paper. Singapore, 2015.

Jervis, Robert, "Perception, Misperception, and the End of the Cold War," dalam William Wohlforth (Ed.), Witnesses to the End of the Cold War, (Harvard: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996).

Jervis, Robert, ―War and Misperception, Journal of Interdisciplinary History 18 No. 4 (1988): 675-700.

Jervis, Robert, ―Minimizing Mispercption dalam G. Matthew Bohnam and Michael Shapiro (ed.), Thought and Action in Foreign Policy, (Basel: Birkauser Verlag, 1977)

Jervis, Robert, Perception and Misperception in International Politics (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976), 58–113.

Jervis, Robert, ―Hypotheses in Misperception, World Politics 20 No. 3 (1968): 454-479; Kementerian Luar Negeri Republik Indonesia, ―Pernyataan Pers Tahunan Menteri Luar Negeri Republik Indonesia Retno L. P. Marsudi Tahun 2017(Jakarta, 2017).

Kurniawan, Yandry, ―Indonesia‘s View on ‗One Belt One Road‘ Initiative: Hopes and Concerns. Makalah disampaikan dalam Konferensi The 21st Century Maritime Silk Road and Sino-Indonesia Strategic Cooperation, tanggal 25-26 April 2016 di Wuhan, Tiongkok.

Laksmana, E. (2012) ―Regional order by Other Means? Examining the Rise of Defense Diplomacy in Southeast Asia‖, Asian Security, Vol. 8(3): 251-270.

Laksmana, Evan. ―Indonesia‘s Rising Regional and Global Profile: Does Size Really Matter?‖ Contemporary Southeast Asia 33, no. 2 (2011): 157–82.

Laksmana, Evan A. ―Defence Diplomacy in Southeast Asia: Trends, Prospects and Challenges. In From “Boots” To “Brogues”: The Rise of Defence Diplomacy in Southeast Asia, edited by Bhubhindar Singh and See Seng Tan, 71–89. Singapore: S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, 2011.

Levy, Jack S., ―Misperception and the Causes of War: Theoretical Linkages and Analytical Problems, World Politics 36, no. 1 (1983): 76–99.

Malczewska, Klaudia, ―Chinese Claim to the South China Sea under International Law, dalam D. Mierzejewski, K. Żakowski (editor) On Their Own Paths: Japan and China Responses to the Global and Regional Challenges (Łódź: Łódź University Press, 2015).

Mearsheimer, John J. and Stephen M. Walt, ―The Case for Offshore Balancing: A Superior U.S. Grand Strategy, Foreign Affairs 95, no.4 (2016): 70–83.

Mearsheimer, John J., ―China‘s Unpeaceful Rise, Current History 105, no. 690 (2006): 160–62.

Mearsheimer, John J., The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2001).

Ministry of Defence (2000) ―Defence Diplomacy‖, The Ministry of Defence Policy Papers No.1, London: Directorate General Corporate Communication, MoD.

Misalucha, Charmaine G. ―U.S.-Philippines Security Ties: Building New Foundation? Asian Politics & Policy 8, no. 1 (2016): 51–61.

Office of the Secretary of Defense. Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2016. Washington, D.C., 2016.

Parameswaran, Prashanth, Playing It Safe: Malaysia’s Approach to the South China Sea and Implications for the United States, Maritime Strategy Series, Maritime Strategy Series (Washington, D.C., 2015).

Pattiradjawane, Rene L., ―Perilaku Ambiguitas Memicu Konlfik Militer, Kompas, July 2, 2016.

Pedrozo, Raul, ―China versus Vietnam: An Analysis of the Competing Claims in the South China Sea‖. A CNA Occasional Paper (2014).

Roach, J. Ashley. ―Malaysia and Brunei: An Analysis of their Claims in the South China Sea. A CAN Occasional Paper (2014)

Rosen, E. Mark, ―Philippine Claims in the South China Sea: A Legal Analysis. CAN Occasional Paper (2014).

Rüland, Jürgen, and Maria-Gabriela Manea. ―The Politics of Military Reform in Indonesia and Nigeria.‖ In The Politics of Military Reform: Experiences from Indonesia and Nigeria, edited by Jürgen Rüland,

Maria-Gabriela Manea, and Hans Born, 3–25. New York: Springer, 2013.

Sebastian, Leonard C., Ristian Atriandi Supriyanto, and I Made Andi Arsana, Indonesia and the Law of the Sea: Beyond the Archipelagic Outlook, National Security College Issue Brief (Canberra, 2014)

Stein, Arthur A., ―When Perception Matters,‖ World Politics 34, no. 4 (1982): 505–26.

Supriyanto, Ristian Atriandi, ―Out of Its Comfort Zone: Indonesia and the South China Sea‖. Asian Policy Vol. 21 (2016). Syafwi, I. Analisis Diplomasi Pertahanan Indonesia dalam Pemenuhan Tujuan-Tujuan Pertahanan Indonesia (2003-2008), (Jakarta, Tesis Program Studi Pascasarjana Ilmu Hubungan Internasional, Universitas Indonesia, 2009).

White, Ralp K., ―Misperception and War, Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology 10 No. 4 (2004): 399.

Wibisono, Ali A., Broto Wardoyo, and Yandry Kurniawan. Satu Dekade Reformasi Militer. Jakarta: PACIVIS-UI, 2008.

Wiranto, Surya. ―Wawancara Dengan Laksamana Muda TNI (Purn) Surya

Wiranto, Staf Ahli Menko Polhukam Bidang Kemaritiman. Jakarta, 2017.

Working Group on Security Sector Reform, Tim ProPatria. Reformasi Sektor Keamanan Indonesia. Jakarta: ProPatria, 2004

Yang, Jian. ―The Rise of China: Chinese Perspectives. In The Rise of China and International Security: America and Asia Respond, edited by Kevin J. Cooney and Yoichiro Sato, 13–37. New York: Routledge, 2009.

Yoshihara, T. (2016), ―The 1974 Paracels Sea Battle: A Campaign Apraisal, Naval War College Review, Vol. 69(2): 50.

Zaki, Ahmad M. dan Mohd Aazizuddin M. Sani, ―China‘s Assertive Posture in Reinforcing its Territorial dan Sovereignty Claim in the South

China Sea: An Insight into Malaysia‘s Stance.‖ Japanese Journal of Political Science Vol. 18(1) (2017).


Agusman, Damos Dumoli. ―Wawancara Dengan Dr. Damos Dumoli

Agusman, Sekretaris Direktorat Jenderal Hukum Dan Perjanjian Internasional. Jakarta, 2017.

Jose Antonio Morato Tavares, ―Wawancara Dengan Jose Antonio Morato Tavares, Direktur Jenderal Kerja Sama ASEAN, Kementerian Luar

Negeri Republik Indonesia (Jakarta, 2017).

James Kraska, ―Wawancara Dengan Dr. James Kraska‖ (2017).

Media Online

Azwar, Amahl, ―Govt Looks to Approve East Natuna Bid, Jakarta Post,August 14,2013, http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2013/08/14/govt-looks-approve-east-natuna-bid.html.

Bulletin de l'Ecole française d'Extrême-Orient, diakses melalui http://www.persee.fr/doc/befeo_0336-1519_1923_num_23_1_5946, 3 September 2017.

Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (CLCS) Purpose, functions and sessions, diakses melalui http://www.un.org/depts/los/clcs_new/commission_purpose.htm

Erickson, Andrew S. ―Steaming Ahead, Course Uncertain: China‘s Military Shipbuilding Industry. The National Interest, 2016. http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/steaming-ahead-course-uncertain-chinas-military-shipbuilding-16266?page=2. Historical documents on Vietnam‘s sovereignty over Paracel and Spratly islands, diakses melalui http://english.vietnamnet.vn/fms/special-reports/9481/historical-documents-on-vietnam-s-sovereignty-over-paracel-and-spratly-islands.html, 3 September 2017.

National Development and Reform Commission--NDRC (2015), ―Vision and Actions on Jointly Building Silk Road Economic Belt and 21st-Century Maritime Silk Road,‖ Beijing, 28 Maret, http://en.ndrc.gov.cn/newsrelease/201503/t20150330_669367.html Oegroseno, Arif Havas, ―Indonesia, South China Sea and the 11/10/9-dashed lines,‖ Jakarta Post, 9 April, 2014,http://m.thejakartapost.com/news/2014/04/09/indonesia-south-china-sea-and-11109-dashed-lines.html.

Robert D. Kaplan, ―The South China Sea Is the Future of Conflict, Foreign Policy, 2011, http://foreignpolicy.com/2011/08/15/the-south-china-sea-is-the-future-of-conflict/.

Denyer, Simon, ―How China‘s Fishermen Are Fighting a Covert War in the South China Sea, The Washington Post, 2016, https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/fishing-fleet-puts-china-on-collision-course-with-neighbors-in-south-china-sea/2016/04/12/8a6a9e3c-fff3-11e5-8bb1-f124a43f84dc_story.html?postshare=451460511139565&tid=ss_tw&utm_term=.56996a6f0d94.

SIPRI. ―Increase in Arms Transfers Driven by Demand in the Middle East and Asia, Says SIPRI.‖ Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, 2017. https://www.sipri.org/media/press-release/2017/increase-arms-transfers-driven-demand-middle-east-and-asia-says-sipri.

Supriyanto, Ristian Atriandi, ―Indonesia‘s Natuna Islands: Next Flashpoint in the South China Sea?‖ S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), RSIS Commentary, No. 033, 16 Februari 2015. https://www.rsis.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/CO15033.pdf. S. Mitchell, ―Territorial Disputes‖, Oxford Bibliographies, 26 May 2016. Diakses melalui http://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199743292/obo-9780199743292-0178.xml, pada tanggal 6 April 2017.

The State Council of the People‘s Republic of China. ―Full Text: China‘s Policies on Asia-Pacific Security Cooperation, 2017. http://english.gov.cn/archive/white_paper/2017/01/11/content_281475539078636.htm. United Nations, ―Permanent Mission of the Republic of Indonesia, no.480/POL-703/VII/10, July 8, 2010 http://www.un.org/Depts/los/clcs_new/submissions_fles/mysvnm33_09/idn_2010re_mys_vnm_e.pdf.

Vibhanshu Shekhar and Joseph Chiyong Liow, ―Indonesia as a Maritime Power: Jokowi‘s Vision, Strategies, and Obstacles Ahead, The Brookings Institution, 2014, http://www.brookings.edu/research/articles/2014/11/indonesia-maritime-liow-shekhar.

Zhengyu, Li. ―Chinese Shipbuilding and Shipbuilding Capacity. Clarkson Research Institute, 2011. https://www.marinemoney.com/sites/all/themes/marinemoney/forums/china11/chinapresentations/LiZhengyu.pdf.

―Brunei Maintains a Low Profile in Pressing Its South Chine Sea Claims. World Politics Review, diakses melalui https://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/trendlines/17799/brunei-maintains-a-low-profile-in-pressing-its-south-china-sea-claims

―Brunei, Silent Claimant in the South China Sea‖. Foreign Policy Association, diakses melalui https://foreignpolicyblogs.com/2016/04/28/brunei-silent-claimant-


―China‘s Military Strategy.‖ Beijing: The State Council Information Office of the People‘s Republic of China, 2015.

―China‘s Peaceful Development.‖ Beijing: The State Council Information Office of the People‘s Republic of China, 2011.

―China claims territories of 23 countries, even though it only has borders with 14‖, China Daily Mail, diakses melalui https://chinadailymail.com/2013/12/01/china-claims-territories-of-23-countries-but-only-has-borders-with-14/, pada tanggal 6 Juni 2017.

―China‘s Cost Guard Rams Fishing Boat to Free It from Indonesian Authorities, The New York Times, 21 Maret 2016, diakses melalui https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/22/world/asia/indonesia-south-china-sea-fishing-boat.html?_r=0, pada tanggal 9 April 2017.

―Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Hua Chunying‘s Regular Press Conference on April 9, 2015.‖ Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, 2015.

―Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Hong Lei‘s Regular Press Conference on November 12, 2015, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, 12 November 2015, diakses melalui http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/xwfw_665399/s2510_665401/t1314306.shtml, pada tanggal 9 April 2017.

―Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Hua Chunying's Remarks on Indonesian Navy Vessels Harassing and Shooting Chinese Fishing Boats and Fishermen”, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, 19 Juni 2016, diakses melalui http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/xwfw_665399/s2510_665401/t13 73402.shtml, pada tanggal 9 April 2017.

―Indonesia: A Bigger Role in the South China Sea? The Diplomat, 9 Juli 2014, diakses melalui http://thediplomat.com/2014/07/indonesia-a-bigger-role-in-the-south-china-sea/, pada tanggal 9 April 2017.

―Indonesia and China Clash in the South China Sea‖, World Political Review, 24 Maret 2016, diakses melalui http://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/trend-lines/18297/indonesia-and-china-clash-in-the-south-china-sea ―Indonesia Navy Fires on Chinese Fishing Boat, Injuring One, Beijing Claims‖, The Guardian, 19 Juni 2016, diakses melalui https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jun/20/indonesian-navy-fires-on-chinese-fishing-boat-injuring-one-beijing-claims, pada tanggal 9 April 2017.

―Inside China: China Clarifies Natuna Islands Sovereignty to Indonesia, The Washington Post, 19 November 2015, diakses melalui http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/nov/19/inside-china-china-concedes-natuna-islands-to-indo/, pada tanggal 9 April 2017.

―Mapping the World‘s Territorial Disputes‖, The Huffington Post, diakses melalui http://www.huffingtonpost.com/max-galka/mapping-the-worldsterrit_b_8637016.html, pada tanggal 6 April 2017.

―The ICOW Territorial Claims Data Set‖, diakses melalui http://www.paulhensel.org/icowterr.html, pada tanggal 6 Juni 2017.

―The Silent Claimant in the South China Sea‖. ASEAN Today, diakses melalui https://www.aseantoday.com/2017/07/the-silent-claimant-in-the-south-china-sea/

―Timeline: China‘s Maritime Disputes,‖ Council on Foreign Relations, diakses melalui http://www.cfr.org/asia-and-pacific/timeline-chinas-maritime-disputes/p37249, pada tanggal 8 April 2017.

―Timeline: South China Sea Dispute, Financial Time, 12 July 2016, diakses melalui https://www.ft.com/content/aa32a224-480e-11e6-8d68-72e9211e86ab, pada tanggal 8 April 2017.

―Shift as Vietnam Marks South China Sea Battle‖, BBC News, 15 Januari 2014, diakses melalui http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-25709833, pada tanggal 8 April 2017.

―South China Sea: The Case Against an ADIZ, The Diplomat, 13 September 2016 diakses melalui http://thediplomat.com/2016/09/south-china-sea-the-case-against-an-adiz/, pada tanggal 9 April 2017.

―Wang Yi Talks about China‘s Four Point Consensus on South China Sea Issue with Brunei, Cambodia and Laos,‖ Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, 2016, http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/zxxx_662805/t1358478.shtml., pada tanggal 9 April 2017.

―Why is South China Sea Contentious?‖ BBC, 12 July 2016, diakses melalui http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-pacific-13748349, pada tanggal 8 April 2017.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.33172/jdp.v3i3.179


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Ethics in Publishing

Publishing ethics refers to COPE (Commitee on Publication Ethics) and Regulation of the Head of LIPI Number 5 of 2014 concerning the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publications.

This statement outlines the ethical behavior expected of all parties. The parties are related and obedient in their respective positions and roles: authors, editorial board, peer reviewers, and publishers, who are involved in publishing articles in this journal.

Authors create articles. Authors should read the policies that apply to their contributions and the author's guidelines. Once a submission has reached the review stage, authors are not allowed to withdraw it. The author accepts editorial decisions voluntarily.

Editorial Board
The editor consists of the chief editor and staff as a unit. Editors grade manuscripts on intellectual merit alone, regardless of the author's rank, title, skin color, gender, sexual orientation, religion, ethnicity, nationality, or political philosophy. Corresponding authors, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and publishers, as appropriate, are the only parties to whom any editor and editorial staff may divulge information about manuscripts that have been submitted. The editor chooses which article to publish. When reaching a choice, the editor can consult with other editors or reviewers.

Peer Reviewers

Peer review provides an assessment of the articles submitted by the editor. The reviewer's assessment results assist the editor in editing the assessment and can also help the author improve the article through the editorial communication with the author. Any selected reviewer who believes they lack the skills necessary to evaluate a manuscript or realizes that doing so quickly is impossible should notify the editor and withdraw from the review process. The review must be carried out impartially. It would be inappropriate to criticize the author personally. Referees must clearly state their position and provide evidence to support them. Any manuscript sent to you for review should be treated with confidentiality. They cannot be discussed or shown to anyone without the editor's permission. Reviewers must indicate related published work that the author still needs to cite. Suitable quotations must support any claim that specific observations, deductions, or arguments have been recorded. Any significant overlap or resemblance between the manuscript under consideration and other published material of which the reviewer has direct knowledge must be communicated to the editor.


The publisher is the institution that publishes the journal. Universitas Pertahanan Press under the Universitas Pertahanan Republik Indonesia, publisher of this Journal of Defense Diplomacy. Moral and ethical obligations as publishers are aware of and take their duties and responsibilities seriously during and throughout the publication process. For publishing journals, publishers work closely with editorial boards to facilitate communication with other journals and publishers.

Alamat Dewan Redaksi:
Alamat: Jl. Salemba Raya No.14, RT.3/RW.6, Kenari, Kec. Senen,
Kota Jakarta Pusat, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 10430
Email: pertahanandiplomasi@gmail.com
Website: http://jurnalprodi.idu.ac.id/index.php/DP

Creative Commons License
Jurnal Diplomasi Pertahanan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 View My StatCounter