Email this article 
DIPLOMASI PERTAHANAN INDONESIA TERHADAP KEBIJAKAN MINIMUM ESSENTIAL FORCE DI KEMENTERIAN PERTAHANAN
Abstract
(izna.fachrurrozi@gmail.com)
Abstrak -- Minimum Essential Forces adalah kebijakan pembangunan postur pertahanan negara yang dicanangkan oleh pemerintah Indonesia pada tahun 2010 yang terdiri dari tiga renstra hingga tahun 2024. Kebijakan tersebut dicanangkan atas dasar dinamika lingkungan strategis, ancaman, dan kekuatan nasional. Dalam kondisi saat ini dimana pengembangan pertahanan negara merupakan hal yang vital, oleh karena itu realiasi terhadap hal tersebut adalah hal yang vital. Diplomasi Pertahanan sendiri sebagai sarana non-violence use of military power menjadi salah satu instrumen dalam perwujudan hal tersebut. Bagaimana Diplomasi pertahanan berperan dalam realisasi hal tersebut menjadi focus pada penelitian ini melalui fungsi dari diplomasi pertahanan itu sendiri yaitu, confidence building measure, defense capabilities, dan Industri pertahanan. Analisa data akan dilakukan secara deskriptif kualitatif dengan mengumpulkan data sebanyak – banyak untuk kemudian dilakukan reduksi dan Analisa terkait data yang relevan dalam penelitian ini. Hasil yang ditemukan adalah Diplomasi Pertahanan memberikan dampak yang signifikan dalam realisasi kebijakan MEF, dimana Diplomasi Pertahanan dapat menjembatani pengelolaan pandangan yang didalamnya melalui hubungan sipil militer domestik, dan militer asing – domestik serta kemajuan teknologi dan pengetahuan terkait bidang pertahanan. Yang kemudian dapat digunakan sebagai bahan acuan untuk pilihan strategi pengembangan pertahanan negara menuju ke arah yang Ideal (Essensial Forces)
Kata kunci: diplomasi pertahanan, kualitatif, minimum essential force
Abstract -- Minimum Essential Force is Indonesia’s policy in term of building defense postur which in motion since 2010 consist of three strategic planing untill 2024. Said policy undelining several aspects from the dynamic of strategic environment, threat, and national power. Realizing the importance of managing and improving defense capabilities, realization of said policy is vital. Defense Diplomacy as non – violence uses of military power become one of the instrumen that contribute greatly which become the focus of this research through its function in confidence building measure, defense capabilites, and defense industry. Data analysis conducted with qualitative method to collect then reduce to obtain relevant data. This research concluded that defense diplomacy contributes greatly in realization of MEF whereas Defense Diplomacy able to bridge perception in civil – military relation and foreign military relation and contribute to improvement in defense technology and knowledge. In days to come, Defense Diplomacy as an instrument will continue its role in establisihing Indonesia’s Defense Capabilities to Ideal level.
Keywords: defense diplomacy, minimum essential force, qualitativeFull Text:
PDFReferences
Allison, G. (1971). Essence of decision; explaining the Cuban missile crisis. Boston: Little, Brown.
Burridge, G.R and Alan James. (2003). A Dictionary of Diplomacy Second Edition. Palgrave Macmillan.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Los Angeles: Sage.
Griffiths, Martin, O’Callaghan, Terry & Roach, C. Steven. (2008). International Relations: The Key Concepts Second Editions. New York: Routledge.
Kementerian Pertahanan Republic Indonesia. “Buku Putih Pertahanan Indonesia 2015”.
Nye, J. S. (2011). The future of power. New York: PublicAffairs.
Thucydides, Warner, R., & In Finley, M. I. (1972). History of the Peloponnesian War. Harmondsworth, Eng: Penguin Books.
Jurnal
Codevilla, Angelo.M.2018. Tools of Statecraft: Diplomacy and War.
Jervis, Robert.1982. Detterence and Perception dalam International Security Vol 7, No. 3. The MIT Press.
Keohane, Keohane. “Functional Theory of Regime” Dalam Berkeley Journal of International Law. Cooperation in International Relations: A Comparison of Keohane, Haas, and Franck. (1996). Volume 4 Issue 1 Article 5.
Marks, Sally & Chas W. Freeman.2019. Diplomacy. https://www.britannica.com/topic/diplomacy. Diakses pada 27 November 2018.
Sudarsono, Juwono. Dalam Keynote Speech Professor Juwono Sudarsono di Indonesia Programme At The S. Rajaratnam School Of International Studies yang bertajuk Transforming The Indonesian Armed Forces 2011.
Perundang – undangan
Pemenuhan Tujuan-Tujuan Pertahanan Indonesia (2003-2008).
Peraturan Menteri Pertahanan Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2012 terkait penyelarasan Minimum Essential Force.
Undang – Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Website
Global Fire Power. 2018. Indonesia Millitary Strength. https://www.globalfirepower.com/country-military-strength-detail.asp?country_id=indonesia diakses pada 28 November 2018.
Global Fire Power. 2018. Singapore Millitary Strength. https://www.globalfirepower.com/country-military-strength-detail.asp?country_id=singapore diakses pada 28 November 2018.
Global Fire Power. 2018. South East Asia. https://www.globalfirepower.com/countries-listing-southeast-asia.asp, diakses pada 28 November 2018.
Hakim, Syaiful.2018. Panglima TNI: MEF 2019 Capai 72 Persen”. https://sumbar.antaranews.com/nasional/berita/755153/panglima-tni-mef-2019-capai-72-persen?utm_source=antaranews&utm_medium=nasional&utm_campaign=antaranews diakses pada 25 november 2018.
Hermanta.2018.TNI Targetkan Akhir 2019 Akan Capai 72% MEF. http://rri.co.id/pontianak/post/berita/580514/daerah/tni_targetkan_akhir_2019_akan_capai_72_mef.html, diakses pada 29 November 2019.
Nugroho, Adityo. 2018. Anggaran Pertahanan RI Masih Jauh Dari Ideal, https://keamanan.rmol.co/read/2018/03/19/331349/Anggaran-Pertahanan-RI-Masih-Jauh-Dari-Ideal-, diakses pada 28 Desember 2018.
Parameswaran, Prashanth.” What’s Behind Singapore’s New Defense Budget Number”, dalam https://thediplomat.com/2018/02/whats-behind-singapores-new-defense-budget-numbers/ diakses pada 8 Agustus 2018.
Purbaya, Angling Adhitya. 2018. Mau Digeber Lagi, Proyek Trans Papua Tunggu Saran TNI/ Polri. https://finance.detik.com/infrastruktur/d-4340404/mau-digeber-lagi-proyek-trans-papua-tunggu-saran-tnipolri diakses pada 20 Februari 2019.
Sempa, Francis P.”Hans Morgenthou And Tha Balance of Power in Asia, dalam https://thediplomat.com/2015/05/hans-morgenthau-and-the-balance-of-power-in-asia/, diakses pada 7 Juli 2018.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33172/jdp.v5i2.414
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Ethics in Publishing
Publishing ethics refers to COPE (Commitee on Publication Ethics) and Regulation of the Head of LIPI Number 5 of 2014 concerning the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publications.
This statement outlines the ethical behavior expected of all parties. The parties are related and obedient in their respective positions and roles: authors, editorial board, peer reviewers, and publishers, who are involved in publishing articles in this journal.
Author
Authors create articles. Authors should read the policies that apply to their contributions and the author's guidelines. Once a submission has reached the review stage, authors are not allowed to withdraw it. The author accepts editorial decisions voluntarily.
Editorial Board
The editor consists of the chief editor and staff as a unit. Editors grade manuscripts on intellectual merit alone, regardless of the author's rank, title, skin color, gender, sexual orientation, religion, ethnicity, nationality, or political philosophy. Corresponding authors, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and publishers, as appropriate, are the only parties to whom any editor and editorial staff may divulge information about manuscripts that have been submitted. The editor chooses which article to publish. When reaching a choice, the editor can consult with other editors or reviewers.
Peer Reviewers
Peer review provides an assessment of the articles submitted by the editor. The reviewer's assessment results assist the editor in editing the assessment and can also help the author improve the article through the editorial communication with the author. Any selected reviewer who believes they lack the skills necessary to evaluate a manuscript or realizes that doing so quickly is impossible should notify the editor and withdraw from the review process. The review must be carried out impartially. It would be inappropriate to criticize the author personally. Referees must clearly state their position and provide evidence to support them. Any manuscript sent to you for review should be treated with confidentiality. They cannot be discussed or shown to anyone without the editor's permission. Reviewers must indicate related published work that the author still needs to cite. Suitable quotations must support any claim that specific observations, deductions, or arguments have been recorded. Any significant overlap or resemblance between the manuscript under consideration and other published material of which the reviewer has direct knowledge must be communicated to the editor.
Publisher
The publisher is the institution that publishes the journal. Universitas Pertahanan Press under the Universitas Pertahanan Republik Indonesia, publisher of this Journal of Defense Diplomacy. Moral and ethical obligations as publishers are aware of and take their duties and responsibilities seriously during and throughout the publication process. For publishing journals, publishers work closely with editorial boards to facilitate communication with other journals and publishers.
Alamat Dewan Redaksi:
Alamat: Jl. Salemba Raya No.14, RT.3/RW.6, Kenari, Kec. Senen,
Kota Jakarta Pusat, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 10430
Email: pertahanandiplomasi@gmail.com
Website: http://jurnalprodi.idu.ac.id/index.php/DP
Jurnal Diplomasi Pertahanan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.