Pendekatan Neorealis terhadap Studi Keamanan Nasional
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33172/jdp.v7i1.674Abstract
Neo-realist approach towards national security is still applicable even until now. The current changes in strategic environment of the world has just made living as a state even more complex. The ever-changing situation is growing rapidly, and the a certain strategic approaches is needed to fully grasp and deal with the situation. This article aims to describe the neoreailsm approach towards the study of national security. Content analysis method will be used in this article. According to Kenneth Waltz, power is the most important factor in international relations. The competition between states is just a product of the current structure of international system. From more than 20 articles referenced here, it can be summarized that changes in strategic environment is heavily affected by the latest industrial revolution. Thus, from neorealist approach, the security dilemma is even bigger than it was decades ago. New threats and opportunites come together and raised the bar even higher in modern times.
Keywords: Neo-realism, National Security, security dilemma
References
Amaritasari, I. (2015). Keamanan Nasional dalam Konsep dan Standar Internasional.
Jurnal Keamanan Nasional.
Barry Buzan, People, States and Fear: an Agenda for International Security Studies in the
Post-Cold War. (Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publisher, 1991).
Barry Buzan & Lenen Hensen. The Evolution of International Security Studies. United
Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
Darmono, Keamanan Nasional: Sebuah Konsep dan Sistem keamanan Bagi Bangsa Indonesia, Sekretariat Jendral dewan ketahanan Nasional, Jakarta, 2010, hlm 24
David Mutimer, Beyond Strategy: Critical Thinking and the New Security Studies, dalam
Contemporary Security and Strategy, Craig A Snyder (ed), (London: Macmillan Press
Ltd, 1999), 77
Halkis, Mhd, 2017, Konstelasi Politik Indonesia: Pancasila dalam Analisis Fenomenologi
Hermeneutika, Yayasan Obor, Jakarta
Mas’oed, Mochtar. 1989. Studi Hubungan Internasional, Tingkat Analisis dan Teorisasi.
Yogyakarta: Pusat antar Universitas studi Sosial UGM.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. WW Norton & Company.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2007). Structural realism. International relations theories: Discipline
and diversity, 83
Perwita, Anak Agung Banyu & Yani, Yanyan A. 2005. Pengantar Ilmu Hubungan
Internasional. Bandung: Rosdakarya.
Perwita, Anak Agung Banyu. Hakikat Prinsip dan Tujuan Pertahanan-Keamanan Negara,
dalam Tim Propatria Institute, Mencari Format Komprehensif Sistem Pertahanan dan
Keamanan Negara, (Jakarta: Propatria, 2006)
Perwita, Anak Agung Banyu. Dinamika Keamanan Dalam Hubungan Internasional dan
Implikasinya Bagi Indonesia. Bandung: Universitas Katholik Parahyangan, 2008
Rudi, T. May. 2002. Study STRATEGIS: Dalam transformasi Sistem Internasional Pasca
Perang dingin
Septa, Albert Alfa. “Ancaman Keamanan Australia Pada Masa Pemerintahan John
Howard: 2001-2007.” Jurnal Analisis Hubungan Internasional Vol. 7 No. 2, Mei 2018.
Sitompul, Josua. 2012. Cyberspace, Cybercrimes, Cyberlaw: Tinjauan Aspek Hukum
Pidana. Jakarta: PT. Tatanusa.
Sujarweni, V. Wiratna. 2014. Metode Penelitian: Lengkap, Praktis, dan Mudah Dipahami.
Yogyakarta: Pustaka Baru Press.
Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. Long Grove.
