Japan's Remilitarization, Passive Constitutional Amendment Discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33172/jdp.v7i3.775Abstract
This journal aims to observe the Japanese remilitarization plan of some elements of Japanese politics to amend the Pacifism constitution in article 9 related to military capabilities and the factors behind it. Japan's plan to amend Article 9 is a step that is considered important to make it easier for Japan to fulfil its national interests in the field of defence and security in the Pacific and East Asia regions. A qualitative approach is carried out to observe the facts that occur and is followed by using several concepts in analysing the phenomenon. The data collection technique that will be used is to find library research data. The perspective of Neorealism, the Concept of National Interest and Foreign Policy are used as the basis and direction to answer issues related to Japanese remilitarization and the discourse on the amendment of Article 9 of the Japanese Pacifism Constitution and the reasons behind the plan.References
Al Hakim, R. N. (2019). GERAKAN MASSA PASCA PENDUDUKAN AMERIKA DI JEPANG. Lensa Budaya: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Budaya, 14(2), 72–88.
Arifiyanto, I. (2013). Diplomasi Multilateral Jepang Terhadap Perkembangan Senjata Nukli Korea Utara Periode 2002-2009. Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah.
Couloumbis, T., & Wolfe, J. H. (1986). Pengantar Hubungan Internasional: Power and Justice. Putra Bardin.
Damartyas, M. W. (2018). Reinterpretasi pasal 9 konstitusi 1947 Jepang : Potensi ancaman dalam komitmen war on teror. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 19. http://eprints.undip.ac.id/75587/3/Bab_II.pdf
Dower, J. (1999). Embracing Defeat: Japan in Aftermath of World War II. Penguin.
Gumay, R. N. S. (2016). KEBIJAKAN KEAMANAN JEPANG TERHADAP PROLIFERASI NUKLIR KOREA UTARA PASCA KELUARNYA KOREA UTARA DARI REZIM NON-PROLIFERASI NUKLIR (PERIODE 2003-211). Journal of International Relations, 2(2), 116–126.
Holsti, K. J. (1992). International Politics: A Framework for Analysis (Sixth). Prentice-Hall International Editions.
Hook, G. D., & McCormack, G. (2005). Japan’s Contested Constitution: documents and analysis. Routledge.
Irsan, A. (2007). Budaya dan Perilaku Politik Jepang di Asia. Penerbit Grafindo Khazanah Ilmu.
Laksono, D. A. (2018). Pengaruh Idiosinkratik Shinzo Abe Terhadap Upaya Perubahan Kebijakan Luar Negeri Jepang Dari Pasifisme Idealis Menjadi Pasifisme Proaktif. Jurnal Analisis Hubungan Internasional, 7(3), 58–70.
http://journal.unair.ac.id/download-fullpapers-jahi73b2516703full.pdf
Lee, J.-H., & Cho, I. I. H. (2000). The North Korean Missiles: A Military Threat or a Survival Kit? Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, 12(1), 131–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/10163270009463981
Mardialina, M. (2013). Kontroversi Amandemen Konstitusi Jepang. Interdependence, vol 1, No.(3), 203–221. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/268076060.pdf
Muhammad Fadilah, E., & Sudirman, A. (2018). Analisis Hubungan Sipil-Militer terhadap Perubahan Kebijakan Pertahanan Jepang di Tahun 2015. Jurnal Hubungan Internasional, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.18196/hi.71123
Purwaka, I. F. (2018). UPAYA JEPANG DALAM PROSES AMANDEMEN PASAL 9 KONSTITUSI JEPANG TENTANG KEBIJAKAN PASIFISME DAN DUKUNGAN AMERIKA SERIKAT PERIODE 2014-2016 Oleh Ibnu Fadilla Purwaka. 98. https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/bitstream/123456789/43057/1/IBNU FADILLA PURWAKA-FISIP.pdf
Roza, R. (2013). Implikasi Amandemen Pasal 9 Konstitusi Jepang Terhadap Kawasan. Http://Berkas.Dpr.Go.Id, V(20), 6–7.
Sinaga, O. (2007). ALIANSI JEPANG-AMERIKA SERIKAT DALAM MENGHADAPI PEMBANGUNAN KAPABILITAS MILITER CHINA DAN KOREA UTARA. Hubungan Internasional FISIP UNPAD, 3(September), 119–122.
Vinsensio Dugis. (2018). Teori Hubungan Internasional Perspektif-Perspektif Klasik. In Neorealisme (Issue December). https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Vinsensio_Dugis/publication/321709080_T
