U.S Democracy Campaign during The Civil War in Libya

Adelia Alviani Putri Kartika

Abstract


The NATO intervention in Libya was one of the most contentious conflict in 2011. The permission given by the UNSC for NATO to intervene in Libya led to a debate that said intervention carried out in Libya was not based on the humanitarian objectives but for US national interest. This situation is strengthened by several NATO activities that show their involvement is for the US interest. Some of the US interest are protecting their territorial sovereignty from terrorism, oil interest and democracy campaign or ideology. Ideology is counted as their long-range or important interest. Previous studies have explained the other US interest in Libya such as the oil interest and terrorism. However, there are not many studies that precisely portray the importance of liberalism in this operation. Therefore, this research is questioning on the importance of democracy campaign during operation by NATO for the US. The main argument in this study is that US did not only launch the operation for humanitarian reason but for its own interest and that democracy liberal ideology interest hold the same importance as the other interest of US.

Keywords


United States, Libya, National Interest, Democracy, NATO.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al Jazeera, “The Death of Gaddafi,” Al Jazeera online, 2018. https://www.aljazeera.com/program/the-big-picture/2018/11/5/the-death-of-gaddafi.

Creswell, John W., “Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mix Method Approaches,” (Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, 2009)

Dunne, Tim, et.al, “International Relations Theories; Discipline and Diversity Third Edition,” (Oxford University Press 2013)

Embassy of Libya, “Libya-US Resolutions,” https://www.embassyoflibyadc.org/us-libya-relations.

Haley, P.Edward, “Qaddafi and the United States since 1969,” (New York:Preger, 1985)

History online, “Arab Spring,” 2019, https://www.history.com/topics/middle-east/arab-spring.

Igwe, Stanley C and team, “An Assessment of the motivations for the 2011 NATO Intervention in Libya and its Implications for Africa,” Canadian Social Science, 26 April 2017

Kjell Engelbrekt, et.al, “The NATO Intervention in Libya: Lesson Learned from The Campaign,” Contemporary Security Studies, (Routledge: New York, 2011)

K.J. Holsti, International Politics; A Framework for Analysis Third Edition,” (Prentice-Hall, Inc. Engelwood Cliffs: New Jersey. 1977)

Mearsheimer, John J., “Bound to Fail: The Rise and Fall of the Liberal International Order,” International Security, Vol.43, No. 4 (Spring 2019)

Mearsheimer, John. J., “The Tragedy of Great Power Politics,” New York; W.W. Norton & Co, 2001)

NATO, “Basic Points, A Political and Military Alliance,” NATO, https://www.nato.int/nato-welcome/index.html.

NATO, “Operation Unified Protector Final Mission Stats, Fact Sheet, 2 November 2011.

NATO, ‘What is NATO; Basic points, collective security,” NATO Official. https://www.nato.int/nato-welcome/index.html.

Repertoire of the Practice of the Security Council 2010-2011

Report of The International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, “The Responsibility to Protect,” (Ottawa, Canada; International Development Research Centre, 2001)

The Obama White House, “Obama’s Speech on National Defense University,” The Obama White House YouTube official channel, uploaded on 29 march 2011.

UN Meetings Coverage and Press Release, “Security Council Press Statement on Libya,” 2011, https://www.un.org/press/en/2011/sc10180.doc.htm.

UN News, “Libya: UN to Use Previously Frozen Funds to Procure Medical Supplies,” 2011, https://news.un.org/en/story/2011/08/384402-libya-un-use-previously-frozen-funds-procure-medical-supplies.

UN News, “Ban Strongly Condemns Qadhafi’s Actions Against Protester, Calls for Punishments,” 2011, https://news.un.org/en/story/2011/02/367342-ban-strongly-condemns-qadhafis-actions-against-protesters-calls-punishment.

US Congress, “Libya: Background and U.S Relations, RL33142. November 2008.”




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33172/jdp.v7i3.776

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Ethics in Publishing

Publishing ethics refers to COPE (Commitee on Publication Ethics) and Regulation of the Head of LIPI Number 5 of 2014 concerning the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publications.

This statement outlines the ethical behavior expected of all parties. The parties are related and obedient in their respective positions and roles: authors, editorial board, peer reviewers, and publishers, who are involved in publishing articles in this journal.

Author
Authors create articles. Authors should read the policies that apply to their contributions and the author's guidelines. Once a submission has reached the review stage, authors are not allowed to withdraw it. The author accepts editorial decisions voluntarily.

Editorial Board
The editor consists of the chief editor and staff as a unit. Editors grade manuscripts on intellectual merit alone, regardless of the author's rank, title, skin color, gender, sexual orientation, religion, ethnicity, nationality, or political philosophy. Corresponding authors, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and publishers, as appropriate, are the only parties to whom any editor and editorial staff may divulge information about manuscripts that have been submitted. The editor chooses which article to publish. When reaching a choice, the editor can consult with other editors or reviewers.

Peer Reviewers

Peer review provides an assessment of the articles submitted by the editor. The reviewer's assessment results assist the editor in editing the assessment and can also help the author improve the article through the editorial communication with the author. Any selected reviewer who believes they lack the skills necessary to evaluate a manuscript or realizes that doing so quickly is impossible should notify the editor and withdraw from the review process. The review must be carried out impartially. It would be inappropriate to criticize the author personally. Referees must clearly state their position and provide evidence to support them. Any manuscript sent to you for review should be treated with confidentiality. They cannot be discussed or shown to anyone without the editor's permission. Reviewers must indicate related published work that the author still needs to cite. Suitable quotations must support any claim that specific observations, deductions, or arguments have been recorded. Any significant overlap or resemblance between the manuscript under consideration and other published material of which the reviewer has direct knowledge must be communicated to the editor.

 

Publisher
The publisher is the institution that publishes the journal. Universitas Pertahanan Press under the Universitas Pertahanan Republik Indonesia, publisher of this Journal of Defense Diplomacy. Moral and ethical obligations as publishers are aware of and take their duties and responsibilities seriously during and throughout the publication process. For publishing journals, publishers work closely with editorial boards to facilitate communication with other journals and publishers.


Alamat Dewan Redaksi:
Alamat: Jl. Salemba Raya No.14, RT.3/RW.6, Kenari, Kec. Senen,
Kota Jakarta Pusat, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 10430
Email: pertahanandiplomasi@gmail.com
Website: http://jurnalprodi.idu.ac.id/index.php/DP


Creative Commons License
Jurnal Diplomasi Pertahanan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


 View My StatCounter