Diplomasi Pertahanan Indonesia Melalui Lomba Tembak di Australian Army Skill at Arms Meeting (AASAM)

Faisal Azhar

Abstract


Abstrak – Pentingnya diplomasi pertahanan saat ini membuat negara-negara didunia meningkatkan kegiatan diplomasi pertahanannya. Penelitian ini membahas mengenai diplomasi pertahanan Indonesia melalui Australian Army Skill at Arms Meeting (AASAM). AASAM dilihat dapat dijadikan sebagai media diplomasi pertahanan yang efektif, namun TNI belum memaksimalkannya. Penelitian ini dilakukan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif. Data didapatkan melalui praktik wawancara dengan sumber utama yaitu Kepala Staff Angkatan Darat periode 2011-2013 dan narasumber lainnya. Selain itu, data sekunder didapatkan dari hasil pencarian dari buku, jurnal, dokumen resmi, website resmi serta sumber-sumber lainnya yang dapat dipertanggung jawabkan. Hasil penelitian ini menjelaskan bahwa diplomasi pertahanan Indonesia melalui AASAM untuk menunjukkan profesionalisme TNI, membangun CBM’s dengan negara-negara peserta dan mempromosikan senjata buatan industri pertahanan dalam negeri.

Kata Kunci: Diplomasi, Pertahanan, lomba Tembak, AASAM

 

Abstract – The significant role of defense diplomacy brings countries of the world to increase their defense diplomacy activities. This research is about Indonesia defense diplomacy through Australian Army Skill at Arms Meeting (AASAM). AASAM can be used as an effective media of defense diplomacy however; the Indonesian National Army (TNI) has still not maximized it yet. This research analysis is conducted by using a qualitative approach. The data was obtained through interviews with the main source like the Chief of Army for 2011-2013 and also others sources. Moreover, the secondary data was obtained from books, journals, official documents and websites, and also not limiting to others sources that can be accounted for. The result of this research shows that TNI professionalism, establishes CBM’s with the participated countries in AASAM and promotes the artificial arms made by domestic defense industry.

Key Words: Diplomacy, Defense, Shooting Competition, AASAM

Full Text:

PDF

References


Daftar Pustaka

Buku

Basrowi & Suwandi. (2008). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Cottey, A and Anthony Forster. (2004). Reshaping Defence Diplomacy: New Roles for Military Cooperation and Assistance. Oxon: Routledge.

Siagian, Sondang P. (2008). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, hlm, 3.

Wahyuni, S. (2012). Qualitative Research Method: Theory and Practice. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Baylis, John & Steve Smith. (2001). The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. New York: Oxford University Press.

Dunleavy, P. (1991). Democracy, Bureaucracy and Public Choice: Economic Explanations in Political Science. United Kingdom: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

Hoyt, T. D. (2007). Military and Regional Defense Policy: India, Iraq, Israel. New York: Routledge.

Matthews, R., & Treddenick, J. (2001). Managing the Revolution in Military Affairs. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

Ritzer, George Dan Goodman, Douglas J. (2008). Teori Sosiologi Modern. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Ward, Hugh. (2002). “Rational Choice” dalam Marsh, David dan Gerry Stokker ed., “Theory and Methods in Political Science,” United Kingdom: Palgrave McMillan.

Supriyatno, M. (2014). Tentang Ilmu Pertahanan. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Jurnal & Artikel

Antariksa, A. Yani. (2014). Diplomasi Pertahanan Laut Indonesia dalam Konteks Pergeseran Geopolitik di Kawasan pada Masa Depan. Jurnal Pertahanan.

Anwar, Syaiful. (2014). Perang Diplomasi Pertahanan dalam Mengatasi Tantangan di Bidang Pertahanan. Jurnal Pertahanan.

Army. (2016, Juni 17). Australian Army Skill at Arms Meeting. Retrieved Juli 09, 2016, from Army life: http://www.army.gov.au/Army-life/Sport-and-recreation/AASAM.

Baswedan, A. (2010, Oktober 6). Update Indonesia. Menelusuri Konflik Indonesia-Malaysia.

Istiqomah. (2012). Kerjasama Pertahanan dan Keamanan Australia – Indonesia; Studi Kasus: Lombok Treaty.

Syawfi, I. (2009). Aktifitas Diplomasi Pertahanan Indonesia Dalam Pemenuhan Tujuan-Tujuan Pertahanan. Tesis.

Cottey, Andrew & Anthony Forster. (2010). Strategic Enggagment: Defense Diplomacy as a Means of Conflict Prevention, Adelphi Paper, London: Routledge.

Website resmi

Isak, E. B. (2012, Februari 27). Peran Rumpun Melayu Sebagai Perekat Hubungan Indonesia-Malaysia. Retrieved Februari 22, 2017, from http://repository.unhas.ac.id:http://repository.unhas.ac.id/handle/123456789/1169

Kompas, H. (2016, Mei 23). News/Nasional. Retrieved Juli 15, 2016, from Nasional Kompas: http://nasional.kompas.com/read/2016/05/23/11070011/9.kali.berturut-turut.tni.ad.sabet.juara.umum.lomba.tembak.di.australia.

Salim, P. (2013, May 11). Raja Samudra. Retrieved Januari 11, 2017, from Rajasamudra.com: http://rajasamudera.com/2013/05/peningkatan-kerjasama-pertahanan-indonesia-di-kawasan-asean-dalam-mendukung-diplomasi pertahanan/

Muthana, K. A. (2011). Military Diplomacy. Vol 5. No 1. 1-15.

Salim. P. (2012). Peningkatan Kerjasama Pertahanan Indonesia di Kawasan Asia Tenggara Guna Mendukung Diplomasi Pertahanan dalam Rangka Mewujudkan Stabilitas Kawasan.

Dokumen resmi

Departemen Pertahanan Republik Indonesia. (2015). Buku Putih Pertahanan Indonesia 2015. Jakarta: Departemen Pertahanan Republik Indonesia.

Departemen Pertahanan Republik Indonesia. (2014). Buku Putih Pertahanan Indonesia 2014. Jakarta: Departemen Pertahanan Republik Indonesia.

Kemlu, (2011), Diplomasi Indonesia 2010, Jakarta: Kementrian Luar Negeri Indonesia.

Wawancara

Jenderal (Purn) Pramono Edhie Wibowo, Kepala Staff Angkatan Darat Periode 2011-2013. Wawancara pada tanggal 10 Januari 2017 di Wisma Proklamasi.

LetKol. Frega Wenas Inkiriwang, Mantan Koordinator Kontingen Penembak Indonesia tahun 2005-2008. Wawancara pada tanggal 09 Juli 2016 di Makostrad.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33172/jdp.v3i2.88

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Ethics in Publishing

Publishing ethics refers to COPE (Commitee on Publication Ethics) and Regulation of the Head of LIPI Number 5 of 2014 concerning the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publications.

This statement outlines the ethical behavior expected of all parties. The parties are related and obedient in their respective positions and roles: authors, editorial board, peer reviewers, and publishers, who are involved in publishing articles in this journal.

Author
Authors create articles. Authors should read the policies that apply to their contributions and the author's guidelines. Once a submission has reached the review stage, authors are not allowed to withdraw it. The author accepts editorial decisions voluntarily.

Editorial Board
The editor consists of the chief editor and staff as a unit. Editors grade manuscripts on intellectual merit alone, regardless of the author's rank, title, skin color, gender, sexual orientation, religion, ethnicity, nationality, or political philosophy. Corresponding authors, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and publishers, as appropriate, are the only parties to whom any editor and editorial staff may divulge information about manuscripts that have been submitted. The editor chooses which article to publish. When reaching a choice, the editor can consult with other editors or reviewers.

Peer Reviewers

Peer review provides an assessment of the articles submitted by the editor. The reviewer's assessment results assist the editor in editing the assessment and can also help the author improve the article through the editorial communication with the author. Any selected reviewer who believes they lack the skills necessary to evaluate a manuscript or realizes that doing so quickly is impossible should notify the editor and withdraw from the review process. The review must be carried out impartially. It would be inappropriate to criticize the author personally. Referees must clearly state their position and provide evidence to support them. Any manuscript sent to you for review should be treated with confidentiality. They cannot be discussed or shown to anyone without the editor's permission. Reviewers must indicate related published work that the author still needs to cite. Suitable quotations must support any claim that specific observations, deductions, or arguments have been recorded. Any significant overlap or resemblance between the manuscript under consideration and other published material of which the reviewer has direct knowledge must be communicated to the editor.

 

Publisher
The publisher is the institution that publishes the journal. Universitas Pertahanan Press under the Universitas Pertahanan Republik Indonesia, publisher of this Journal of Defense Diplomacy. Moral and ethical obligations as publishers are aware of and take their duties and responsibilities seriously during and throughout the publication process. For publishing journals, publishers work closely with editorial boards to facilitate communication with other journals and publishers.


Alamat Dewan Redaksi:
Alamat: Jl. Salemba Raya No.14, RT.3/RW.6, Kenari, Kec. Senen,
Kota Jakarta Pusat, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 10430
Email: pertahanandiplomasi@gmail.com
Website: http://jurnalprodi.idu.ac.id/index.php/DP


Creative Commons License
Jurnal Diplomasi Pertahanan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


 View My StatCounter