AUKUS Alliance: United States Strategic Interest in Indo-Pacific

Audry Anjani Danindra Novita


This research talks about the United States’ interests in Indo-Pacific through an alliance called AUKUS, which consists of Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The United States, as a great power, has its focus on maintaining and strengthening security and alliances in the world. As the conflict in the South China Sea arose, the United States focused its strategy on preventing the conflict in the region; hence, the United States allied with Australia and United Kingdom. The research examines the strategy and national interests of the U.S. in the Indo-Pacific region through AUKUS. This research uses a qualitative method, exploring national interests, the means and ways of foreign policy, and the decision-making process on the United States' interest through AUKUS in Indo-Pacific.


Strategic Interest, AUKUS, United States, Indo-Pacific

Full Text:



Corben, T., Townshend, A., & Patton, S. (2021, September 16). What is the AUKUS Partnership? Retrieved from USSC:

Cornish, P. (2021). AUKUS and 'Global Britain': Sub-standard Strategy? city forum, 1-8.

Creswell, J. (1998). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. London: Sage.

Geiger, J. (2021, September 25). ASK US: Recalling Legacies of Anglo-Saxonism and Muffling the Voices of Island Nations. Retrieved from e-IR:

Harding, B. (2021, September 17). Why the New U.S.-U.K.-Australia Partnership is so Significant. Retrieved from United States Institute of Peace:

Jones, P. (2021, September 24). Towards a Biden Doctrine: U.S. National Interest or Global Commitment? Retrieved from RUSI:

Joshi, Y. (2021, October 6). ASK US: Arms Allies and the Geopolitics of the Indo-Pacific. Retrieved from Institute of South Asian Studies:

King, G. (2021, April 16). The First 100 Days: Biden Means Business in the Indo-Pacific. Retrieved from Australian Institute of International Affairs:

Kirchner, S. (2021, October 14). A Geoeconomic Alliance. Retrieved from Australian Outlook:

Kolodziej, E. A. (2021). What Are the Political, Economic, and Strategic Implications of the US-UK Sale of Nuclear Submarines to Australia? Center for Global Studies, 1-11.

Kuo, M. A. (2021, October 7). ASK US: Impact on Indo-Pacific Security Dynamics. Retrieved from The Diplomat:

Laksmana, E. A. (2021, October 17). AUKUS mixed reception is a symptom of strategic fault-lines in Southeast Asia. Retrieved from East Asia Forum:

Miller, J. (2021, October 8). From Afghanistan to AUKUS: The Painful Pivot to Asia. Retrieved from Harvard Politics:

Samaan, J.-L. (2021, October 4). AUKUS and the Future of Alliances in the Indo-Pacific. Retrieved from Trends Research:

Sheng, Y. (2021, September 21). AUKUS deal to continue causing repercussions in transatlantic ties. Retrieved from Global Times:

Smeltz, Dina, et al. (2021, October 26). AUKUS is Awkard, but Not Abnormal: How U.S. Foreign Policy Experts Think About Americas Alliances. Retrieved from War on the Rocks:

The Policy Circle. (2021). Foreign Policy: Asia Pacific. Retrieved from The Policy Circle:

U.S. Department of State. (2019). A Free and Open Indo-Pacific: Advancing a Shared Vision. Washington: U.S. Department of State.

U.S. Mission to ASEAN. (2020, February 21). The U.S. Vision for the Indo-Pacific. Retrieved from U.S. Mission to ASEAN:

White House. (2021, September 15). Background Press Call on AUKUS. Retrieved from The White House:

White House. (2021, September 15). Remarks by President Biden, Prime Minister Morrison of Australia, and Prime Minister Johnson of the United Kingdom Announced the Creation of AUKUS. Retrieved from The White House:

Zhu, M. (2021, October 10). AUKUS Alliance: What is it, what does it have to do with China, and why is France angry? Retrieved from South China Morning Post:



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Ethics in Publishing

Publishing ethics refers to COPE (Commitee on Publication Ethics) and Regulation of the Head of LIPI Number 5 of 2014 concerning the Code of Ethics for Scientific Publications.

This statement outlines the ethical behavior expected of all parties. The parties are related and obedient in their respective positions and roles: authors, editorial board, peer reviewers, and publishers, who are involved in publishing articles in this journal.

Authors create articles. Authors should read the policies that apply to their contributions and the author's guidelines. Once a submission has reached the review stage, authors are not allowed to withdraw it. The author accepts editorial decisions voluntarily.

Editorial Board
The editor consists of the chief editor and staff as a unit. Editors grade manuscripts on intellectual merit alone, regardless of the author's rank, title, skin color, gender, sexual orientation, religion, ethnicity, nationality, or political philosophy. Corresponding authors, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and publishers, as appropriate, are the only parties to whom any editor and editorial staff may divulge information about manuscripts that have been submitted. The editor chooses which article to publish. When reaching a choice, the editor can consult with other editors or reviewers.

Peer Reviewers

Peer review provides an assessment of the articles submitted by the editor. The reviewer's assessment results assist the editor in editing the assessment and can also help the author improve the article through the editorial communication with the author. Any selected reviewer who believes they lack the skills necessary to evaluate a manuscript or realizes that doing so quickly is impossible should notify the editor and withdraw from the review process. The review must be carried out impartially. It would be inappropriate to criticize the author personally. Referees must clearly state their position and provide evidence to support them. Any manuscript sent to you for review should be treated with confidentiality. They cannot be discussed or shown to anyone without the editor's permission. Reviewers must indicate related published work that the author still needs to cite. Suitable quotations must support any claim that specific observations, deductions, or arguments have been recorded. Any significant overlap or resemblance between the manuscript under consideration and other published material of which the reviewer has direct knowledge must be communicated to the editor.


The publisher is the institution that publishes the journal. Universitas Pertahanan Press under the Universitas Pertahanan Republik Indonesia, publisher of this Journal of Defense Diplomacy. Moral and ethical obligations as publishers are aware of and take their duties and responsibilities seriously during and throughout the publication process. For publishing journals, publishers work closely with editorial boards to facilitate communication with other journals and publishers.

Alamat Dewan Redaksi:
Alamat: Jl. Salemba Raya No.14, RT.3/RW.6, Kenari, Kec. Senen,
Kota Jakarta Pusat, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 10430

Creative Commons License
Jurnal Diplomasi Pertahanan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

 View My StatCounter