Pancasila Sebagai Resolusi Konflik: Relasi Kuasa, Agama, dan Antar Etnis di Indonesia Pasca Reformasi
Abstract
Abstrak - Penelitian ini meliputi cross defence study yang menggabungkan ilmu politik dan ilmu pertahanan dengan membahas mengenai Pancasila sebagai resolusi konflik. Pertahanan dibagi menjadi hard power dan soft power. Melalui Tesis ini Pancasila sebagai ideologi mampu memperluas spektrum aksiologis pada resolusi konflik yang terjadi pada relasi kuasa, agama, dan antar etnis di Indonesia pasca reformasi. Bagaimana peran Pancasila sebagai resolusi konflik dan tantangan yang dihadapi oleh Pancasila. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif deskriptif. Data diperoleh dari wawancara dan studi pustaka.Teori yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu teori resolusi konflik, moral conflict theory oleh Christie, terlebih pada resolusi konflik yang berawal dari terciptanya konsensus. kemudian teori politik identitas dan teori relasi kuasa yang dikemukakan oleh Foucault. Lokasi wilayah penelitian di Jakarta, Bandung dan Surabaya. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan Pancasila memberikan nilai-nilai operasional sang secara luas digunakan untuk meresolusi konflik. Resolusi konflik yang meliputi early warning and early system serta forecasting. Yang kedua Pancasila adalah sebagai konsensus nilai dan sumber ilmu, peran ini sesuai dengan butir-butir nilai Pancasila yang secara sequential menjadi landasan perilaku dalam berbangsa dan bernegara. Sedangkan tantangan yang dihadapi Pancasila adalah sebagai dasar negara dan sebagai ideologi Pancasila belum secara populis digunakan sebagai metode meresolusi konflik melalui daur metodologi transformatif. Simpulan dari hasil penelitian ini adalah Pancasila berperan menjadi metanarasi kebangsaan dan konsensus perdamaian.
Kata kunci: Pancasila, Resolusi konflik, relasi kuasa, etnis, agama.
Abstract - This research study covers cross defense that combines political science and the science of defense to discuss the Pancasila as conflict resolution. Defense divided into hard power and soft power. Through this thesis Pancasila as an ideology capable of expanding the spectrum Axiological on conflict resolution that occurs in power relations, religion, and ethnic in Indonesia after the reform. What is the role of Pancasila as conflict resolution and the challenges faced by Pancasila. This research uses descriptive qualitative method. Data obtained from interviews and literature. The theory used in this research is the theory of conflict resolution, conflict moral theory by Christie, especially on conflict resolution originated from the consensus. then the theory of identity politics and power relations theory proposed by Foucault. The location area of research in Jakarta, Bandung and Surabaya. The results showed Pancasila provides the operational values are widely used for meresolusi conflict. Conflict resolution and early include early warning and forecasting system. The second is the Pancasila as the consensus value and a source of knowledge, this role in accordance with a grain of Pancasila values that sequentially form the basis of behavior in the state and nation. While the challenges faced is the Pancasila as the state ideology Pancasila and as yet to be populist used as a method of recycling methodologies meresolusi conflict through transformative. The conclusions of this research is the role to be metanarrative Pancasila national peace and consensus.
Key words: Pancasila, Conflict Resolution, Power relations, Ethnic group, Religion
References
Daftar Pustaka
Afan Gaffar, (1992). Javanese Voters, A Case Study of Election Under a Hegemonic Party System, Yogyakarta: UGM.
Almond, Gabriel A. (1974). Comparative Politic Today, Boston: Little Brown and Co.
Anonim. (2005). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Arnold K. Sherman & Aliza Kolker, (1986).The Social Bases of Politic. California: Devision of Warswath.
Bakrie, CR. (2005). Pertahanan Negara Dan Postur TNI Ideal. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor.
Bartos, O. J., & Wehr, P. (2002). Using Conflict Theory. Cambridge: Cambrige University Press.
Bollen, K.A., & Hoyle, R.H. (1990). Perceived cohesion: A conceptual and empirical examination. Social Forces, 69(2), 479-504.
Budiarto, Heri.(2012). Komunikasi dan Konflik di Indonesia .Jakarta: Showcase.com penerbit,
Cattell, V., Dines, N., Gesler, W., & Curtis, S. (2008). Mingling, observing, and lingering: Everyday public spaces and their implications for well-being and social relations.Health & Place.
Charles Y. Glock & Rodney Stark, (1965). Religion and Society in Tension, Chicago: Rand McNally.
Chomsky, Noam. (1996). World Orders Old and New. New York: Columbia University Press.
Christie, D.J, R.V Wagner & D.D Winter. (2001). Peace, Conflict and Violence. New Jersey; Prentice Hall.
Czudnowski, Moshe M (1977). Political Socialization, Boston: Little Brown and Co.
Deutsch, Morton, et. al. (2006). The Handbook of Conflict Resolution theory and Practice, Jossey Bass: USA.
Eugene Smith, Donald, (1985). Agama dan Modernisasi Politik, (Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
F.W. Dillistone, (2002)The Power of Simbols (terjemahan), Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Foucault, Michael, (1976) Archaeology of Knowledge (Terjemahan),
Yogyakarta: IRCisoD.
Feith,H. dan L. Chastles (eds). (1970) "Indonesian Political Thinkings1945-1955".Itacha: Cornel University Press.
Fred J. Greenstein. (1975). “Personality and Politics”, dalam Fred J. Greenstein & Nilson W. Polsby, Micro PoliticalTheory – Hand Book of Political Science Vol. 2, Addision Wesley Publishing Company.
Latif, Yudi. (2002). Negara Paripurna Historisitas, Rasionalitas, dan Aktualitas Pancasila. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Galtung, J. (2007). Understanding and Transforming Conflict. Handbook of peace and conflict studies. New York; Routledge.
Gardner,H.J.(1993). Multiple Intelligence: A Reader. New York: Basic Book.
Greetz,C.(1972)."The Politics of Means". Itacha &London: Cornell University press
Greetz,C.(1963)."Old State New Society": Newyork:The Free Press
Habermas,J. (2000) "The Public Sphere Reading in Contemporary Political Sociology". Oxford: Blackwell Publisher
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G.J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (Revised and Expanded 3rd ed.). London: McGraw- Hill.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.).
Hutton, Will. (2007). The Writing on The Wall. China and the West in the 21st Century. London: An Hachette Livre UK Company
Huntington,S.P.(1996). The Clash of Civilizations and Remaking of World Order. Newyork: Simon &Schruiser.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Laode, M.D. Dahrin.(2013) Politik Tiga Wajah.Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka OborIndonesia.
Latif, Yudi.(2009) Inteligensia Muslim dan Kuasa Genealogi Inteligensia Muslim Indonesia Abad Ke-20. Jakarta: Prenada media
Latif, Yudi.(2011) Negara Paripurna Historisitas, Rasionalitas dan Aktualitas Pancasila.Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama
Latif, Yudi.(2014) Mata Air Keteladanan. Jakarta:Gramedia Pustaka Utama
Lijphart, A. (2008). Thinking about Democracy: Power Sharing and Majority Rule in Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
Lipset, Seymour Martin, (1960). Political Man: The Social Bases of Politic, (New York: Doubley & Company Inc.
Moleong, L.J. (2007). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Rosdakarsa
Morgenthau, J. Hans. (1991). Politik Antar Bangsa. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia
Ramstedt, Martin (2011) Kegalauan Identitas: Agama, Etnisitas dan Kewarganegaraan pada Masa Pasca-Orde Baru. Jakarta: PT Grasindo
Rothschild,Joseph.(1981) Etnhnopolitics A Conceptual Framework, New York: Columbia University Press.
Sanderson, Stephen K.(1993). Sosiologi Makro,.Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Sawyer, Q. Mark. (2009) Racial Politics in Post-Revolutionary Cuba. Los Angeles: University of California.
Sugiyono. (2012). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta
Suryanegara, Ahmad Mansur. (2010). Api Sejarah 2. Bandung: Salamadani Pustaka Semesta.
Suryanegara, Ahmad Mansur. (2009). Api Sejarah. Bandung: Salamadani Pustaka Semesta.
Tippe, Syarifuddin. (2016). Ilmu Pertahanan: Sejarah, Konsep, Teori dan Implementasi. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.
Ted. C. Lewellen, (1983). Political Anthropology an Introduction, Massachusetts: Bergin & Garvey Publisher, Inc.
Wallensteen, P (2007). Understanding Conflict Resolution. USA; SAGE Publication Ltd.
Wolff, Stefan. (2006). Ethnic Conflict a Global Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wirawan, Sarlito. (2001).Psikologi Sosia Psikologi Kelompok dan Psikologi Terapan. Jakarta:Balai Pustaka.
Jurnal/Tesis & Penelitian Ilmiah
Drucker, P.F.(1964). Managing for Results. New York : Harper&Row
Fisher, Simon et al. (2001). Mengelola Konflik; Keterampilan dan strategi mengelola konflik. Penyunting; S.N Kartikasari. Edisi Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: The British Council, Indonesia.
Forrest, R., & Kearns, A. (2001). Social Cohesion, Social Capital and the Neighbourhood. Urban Studies,38(12), 2125-2143.
Hampden-Turner, Charles and Fons Trompenaars. (2000). Building Cross Cultural Competence. How to Create Wealth from Conflicting Values. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Joshua D. Greene Leigh E. Nystrom Andrew D. EngellJohn M. Darley and Jonathan D. Cohen The Neural Bases of Cognitive Conflict and Control in Moral Judgment New Jersey 08544
LeBaron, Michelle and Bruce Grundison. (1993). Conflict and Culture: Research in Five Communities in British Columbia, Canada. Victoria, British Columbia: University of Victoria Institute for Dispute Resolution.
Lederach, John Paul. (1995). Preparing for Peace. Conflict Transformation Across Cultures. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, pp. 94.
Little, David. (1996)."Religious Militancy," in Managing Global Chaos, eds, Chester A. Crocker, Fen Osler Hampson, and Pamela Aall (Washington DC: USIP Press.
R. Scott Appleby, (2001)."Religion, Conflict Transformation, and Peacebuilding," in Turbulent Peace: The Challenges of Managing International Conflict, eds, Chester A. Crocker, Fen Osler Hampson, and Pamela Aall (Washington DC: USIP Press,
Suharsimi, A. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian; Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1970). An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict England : University of Bristol.
Wahab, Abdul Jamil. (2014). Manajemen Konflik Keagamaan; Analisis Latar Belakang Konflik Keagamaan Aktual. Jakarta: PT. Elex Media Komputindo
Wallensteen, P (2007). Understanding Conflict Resolution. USA; SAGE Publication Ltd.
Wolff, Stefan. (2006). Etnic Conflict a Global Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
Undang-Undang
Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 pasal 27-31 amandemen. Tentang hak asasi beragama
Undang-Undang Nomor 26 tahun 2000 tentang Pengadilan HAM dan juga lembaga Komisi Nasional Hak Asasi Manusia Undang-Undang nomor 7 tahun 2012 tentang penanganan konflik social
Tap MPR no. I/MPR/2003 yang terdiri dari 45 butir Pancasila
Undang-Undang Nomor 39 tahun 1999 tentang Hak Asasi Manusia mengenai kebebasan beragama
Risalah Sidang Badan Penyelidik Usaha-Usaha Persiapan Kemerdekaan Indonesia (BPUPKI) Panitia Persiapan Kemerdekaan Indonesia (PPKI)
Media Daring
American Psychological Association. (2008, August 19). Suicidal Thoughts Among College Students More Common Than Expected. ScienceDaily. Diakses pada 1 September 2016, dari http://www.sciencedaily.com/
Beritasatu.com. SBY dalam menilai Pancasila, bantahan atas the end of Ideologi. releases/200808/080817223436.htm
Maryuni Ardi, Anis. (2014). Manifesto Kammi Jawa Timur, telaah Majapahit.www.jurnal kammi kultural.org diakses pada September 2016 pukul13.44 wib
Hasbullah, “Pilkada dan Politik Etnisitas”, Riau Pos, tanggal 21 Juni 2006.
Bandung.go.id. Diakses pada 1 Maret 2017 pukul 17.49 WIB
Surabaya.go.id. Diakses pada 1 Maret 2017 pukul 19.00 WIB
Jakarta.go.id. Diakses pada 1 Maret 2017 pukul 21.03 WIB
