Islam Nusantara dalam Perspektif Indonesia Modern Menurut Aspek Pertahanan Negara

Authors

  • Alwin Supriyadi Kementrian Pertahanan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33172/pa.v4i1.242

Abstract

Abstrak -- Penelitian ini mengkaitkan antara konsep Islam Nusantara dengan birokrasi di Indonesia, terutama dari penekanan aspek pertahanan. Untuk menganalisis hal tersebut, penelitian ini menggunakan konsep pertahanan RI, ancaman non-militer, dan konsep manajemen birokrasi, dan globalisasi.

Islam Nusantara disini merupakan kekhasan Indonesia yang memiliki sejarah masuknya Islam yang berbeda dengan pengalaman negara-negara lain. Di Indonesia konsep Islam Nusantara bukanlah sebuah konsep baru dalam menghadapi Radikalisme, namun sebuah perwujudan alami dari proses sejarah itu sendiri.

Oleh sebab itu penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bagaimana manajemen birokrasi di pemerintahan Indonesia mampu menanggapi kebutuhan intelektual, baik berupa kegiatan akademik maupun non-akademik seputar Islam Nusantara. Apabila kegiatan-kegiatan Islam Nusantara hanya diampu oleh para aktivis NU, maka konteks pertahanan semesta tidak akan terjadi, sebab pertahanan semesta sejatinya melibatkan semua pihak.

Kata kunci: Islam Nusantara, pertahanan semesta, NU, Radikalisme, ancaman non-militer

 

Abstract -- This study links the Islamic Nusantara concept with the bureaucracy in Indonesia, especially from the emphasis on defense aspects. To analyze this, this study uses the concept of Indonesian national defense system, non-military threats, the concept of bureaucratic management, and globalization.

Islam Nusantara here is a peculiarity of Indonesia which has a history of the entry of Islam which is different from the experience of other countries. In Indonesia the concept of Islamic Nusantara is not a new concept in dealing with radicalism, but a natural manifestation of the historical process itself.

Therefore this study aims to analyze how the management of bureaucracy in the Indonesian government is able to respond to intellectual needs, both in the form of academic and non-academic activities that related to studies of Islam Nusantara. If the activities of the Islam Nusantara are only supported by NU activists, then the context of universal defense will not occur, because the universal defense actually involves all parties.

Keywords: Islamic Nusantara, universal defense, NU, Radicalism, non-military threats

Author Biography

Alwin Supriyadi, Kementrian Pertahanan

Kementrian Pertahanan

References

Daftar Referensi

Anra, Yusdi&Martinis Yamin. 2017. “Relationships between lecturer performance, organizational culture, leadership, and achievement motivation”, Foresight and STI Governance, Vol.11, No.2.

Crowther, David&Chris Carter. 2002. “Legitimating irrelevance: management education in higher education institutions”, The International Journal of Educational Management, 2002.

Eagan, Jennifer. 2010. “Paulo Freire’s Pedagogy of the Oppressed”, Administrative Theory&Praxis, September 2010, Vol.32, No.3. Public Administration Theory Network.

Ehiobuche, Chris, et.al. 2012. “Dialogue as a Tool for Teaching and Learning of Entrepreneurship”, ASBBS Annual Conference: Las Vegas, Vol.19, No.1.

Elliot, Carol. 2003. “Representations of the Intellectual: Insights from Gramsci on Management Education”, Management Learning. Sage Publications.

Emiliani, M.L. 2004. “Is management education beneficial to society?”, Management Decision, Vol.42, No.3, 2004. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Estad, Tom, et.al. 2013. “Implementing liberal management education through the lens of the other”, Journal of Management Development, Vol.33, No.5, 2014. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Gallos, Joan V. 1995. “On management education for women: Faulty assumptions, new possibilities”.

Harney, Stefano&Howard Thomas. 2013. “Towards a liberal management education”, Journal of Management Development, Vol.32, No.5. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Holian, Rosalie. 2004. “The practice of management education in Australian universities”, Management Decision.

Holman, David. 2000. “Contemporary Models of Management Education in the UK”, Management Learning, June 2000. Sage Publications.

Kester, Kevin&Ashley Booth. 2010. “Education, Peace, and Freire: A Dialogue”, Development, 2010.

Kieser, Alfred. 2004. “The Americanization of Academic Management Education in Germany”, Journal of Management Inquiry.

Mavin, Sharon, et.al. 2004. “Gender on the agenda 2: Unlearning gender blindness in management education”, Women in Management Review, Vol.19, No.6. Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.

Ploom, Kristi&Toomas Hadma. 2011. “Balanced performance management in the public education system: An empirical study of Estonian general education schools”, Baltic Journal of Management, Vol.8 No.2, 2013. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Rabasso. 2010. “A Chomskyan approach to responsible critical management education”, Journal of Responsibility, Vol.1, No.1.

Raelin, Joseph A. 1995. “Reformulating management education: Professional education, action learning, and beyond”.

Rasheed, Shaireen. 2005. “Naming and the Existentialist Curriculum of Action: Creating a Pluralistic Pedagogy”, International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning.

Streck, Danilo R. 2009. “Popular Education and Participatory Research: Facing Inequalities in Latin America”, International Journal of Action Research, 2010.

Zald, Mayer N. 2002. “Spinning Disciplines: Critical Management Studies in the Context of the Transformation of Management Education”, Organization, Vol.9, N0.3.

Downloads

Published

2018-08-01

How to Cite

Supriyadi, A. (2018). Islam Nusantara dalam Perspektif Indonesia Modern Menurut Aspek Pertahanan Negara. Peperangan Asimetris (PA), 4(1). https://doi.org/10.33172/pa.v4i1.242